Certain Confidence in a Trustworthy God
The gospel of Luke tells the story of who Jesus is, what he did, and what it means. The word gospel simplhy means good news, and the good news is Jesus' identity, work, and signficance for us. At the beginning of the story (Luke 1:1-4), Luke tells the story about how he wrote the story ...
Sometimes, I like to cheat. If I pick up book, sometimes I'll turn to the end to see if I want to read it. When we pop to end of Luke's introduction to his gospel, we learn why he wrote this: so that his friend Theophilus might have certainty about what he's been taught.
This issue of certainty reminds me of a couple of years ago when a few folk from our church walked across the Queensferry crossing when it opened. I heared lots of excitement about the bridge (a beautiful, technological wonder) and about the chance to walk across it.
But there was also alot I didn't hear. I didn't hear that anyone was nervousness about the bridge. I didn't hear people wondering if it was going to hold them up. I didn't hear anyone make this complaint: 'That bridge was designed and built by humans! I don't trust it!'.
For some reason, when it comes to God's Word, we feel justified in doubting. We live in an age which applauds questions more than answers and celebrates doubting above believing. With this in mind, let's look at Luke's move to place us on a sure foundation.
1. The Background
Luke writes that many have undertaken to compile a narrative. In the wake of Jesus’ death, burial, and resurrection, both oral and written tradition emerged. Jesus told his followers, ‘teach them to observe all I have commanded you’. And so his teachings were taught and written down. But people also began to try to put the teachings in context by telling the story of who Jesus is, what he did, and what it means. When we use the word gospel, that’s what it is: a theological reflection on the life, death, burial, and resurrection of Jesus. That is,
a gospel is both history and theology: it tells us what happened, but it tells us more than what happened – it tells us what it means.
2. Luke’s Subject
The subject of these wrtings were the things accomplished among us. By sayting 'accomplished' Luke means that more than the facts of what happened, he is interested in their results and their significance. What does the life, death, burial, and resurrection of Jesus mean? This phrase moves ones attention from a reference only to the original events to the effect of those events in a later time for all who came to believe’.
Among Us means that this wasn’t done in a corner; all of this was public, this was experienced by eyewitnesses, and the effect of this is still going on. People continue to to be touched by the results of what Jesus accomplished. This phrase moves ones attention from a reference only to the original events to the effect of those events in a later time for all who came to believe’.
3. Luke's Sources
He notes that just as those who from the beginning were eyewitnesses and ministers of the word have delivered them to us. Luke's narrative is based on eye-witness accounts. Luke was a second generation believer - he accompanied Paul on his journeys in the Roman Empire and would have had opportunity to interview all the key players (Mary, Peter, James, John) who knew Jesus and shaped the early church.
These were both eye-witnesses and preachers. This is what Jesus told them to do – to witness to what they had seen. Like in a court room, they were expected to tell the truth, the whole truth, and nothing but the truth. The Apostle John especially highlights this dimension of his ministry when he writes this is in the introduction to his first letter:
That which was from the beginning, which we have heard, which we have seen with our eyes, which we looked upon and have touched with our hands, concerning the word of life. John 1:1
He is highlighting his eyewitness experience: heard, seen, touched. The apostles – and the gospel Luke records – are not just elaborated stories, these are eyewitness accounts.
And although the date when Luke wrote this is disputed, because it ends with Paul still in prison in Rome, there is a strong likelihoold it was written before his death and before the destruction of the temple in Jerusalem – this means that many of these eyewitnesses were still alive. That is, Luke could not play free with the facts, he had to get them write.
The second point he makes about his sources is that they were ministers of the word delivered to us. That is, not only were they eyewitnesses, but as Jesus told them to, they declared this message to others.
4. Luke’s Method:
In reflected on his own approach, Luke notes that it seemed good to me also, having followed all things closely for some time past, to write an orderly account for you. Look at the five characteristics of his writing:
- Having followed: This is the Greek parakoloutheō, and means to follow after, to follow closely, to attend to: ‘having followed along closely’. It refers to the investigation of past events; Luke is letting us know that he is presenting a story in which he has scrutinised the details. ]
- All things/everything: This is the Greek pasin, which means each, every, any, all, the whole, everyone, all things, everything. Luke doesn't tell us everything about Jesus, but he investigated everything.
- For some time past/from the beginning: This is the Greek anōthen and means from the very first, from the beginning.
- Closely (carefully). This is the Gr. akribōs and means exactly, accurately, diligently, in order. Luke’s study is the fruit of a careful and thorough investigation that went back to Jesus’ birth. He followed things closely: there is research and work over a long period of time.
- to write an orderly (Gr.kathex